It appears you have Javascript turned off. You can navigate the site without Javascript, but many features will not work.
Name is required.
Email address is required.
Invalid email address
A reply is required.
Exceeding max length of 5KB
norman parrish — January 06, 09:16PM

who reviews the reviewer

when a reviewer submits a personal bird list and receives an alert on a sighting who reviews that sighting, surely not said reviewer!

Andrew Core — January 08, 11:49AM

see page 16 of the Review and Filter Instructions document, under the heading "Should reviewers review their own records?"
Review Tool and Filter Instructions (download below as .pdf)

"it is preferable to have a different individual act upon your records whenever possible. This ensures greater objectivity and protects against claims of bias in how these records are treated. So please try, when possible, to leave your own records for others to deal with if there is another reviewer with access to review your records.

Up rated: 0 Down
meg test — January 24, 03:43PM

Norman and Andrew,

This is a "yes, but..." situation

Up rated: 0 Down
norman parrish — January 25, 04:02PM

first a question : what is a 'meg test'
as suggested by Andrew i read page 16 of Review and Filter instructions document. my problem is with 'whenever possible' which i see as a loophole. why doesn't Ebird make it an absolute necessity for reviewers to have another reviewer review said reviewers records. i can imagine a reviewer on a remote island without access to a reviewer. in that case why can't that reviewer send records directly to ebird for persons such as Andrew Core to peruse. thanks

Up rated: 0 Down

Post a Reply
seconds ago
a minute ago
minutes ago
an hour ago
hours ago
a day ago
days ago
Invalid characters found